to content

Dynamics of a single atom transition and problem of quantum jumps

Professor Eugene SHTYRKOV

A mechanism of quantum jumps for an atom which is being in a process its proceeding from one stationary energy state to another one is rather vague up to now. Some principle questions are arising to perplex most of the researchers when they deal with a single atom problem. For example:

What is a real physical mechanism of a quantum jump?

Where is the atom just as it leaves one stationary state but have not got at the other one yet?

How does a photon chance to find itself into the atom?

Whether is the photon really indivisible?

This work do not claim answering these points finally but the author would like to show some discrepancies arising while in discussions of the single atom behavior one attempt to combine the photon indivisibility principle with the energy conservation law.

Generally speaking in order to get it these points for the single atom , one should obviously coordinate an adequate theory, reliable experiments and philosophy based on causality with common sense. It well known that the quantum theory can not possibly get along in explaining a deterministic behavior of the single atom during its quantum jumps. As a matter of fact , both the Schroedinger's and its alternative Hysenberg's mechanisms of a quantum jump let us get no satisfactory explanation because both of them are based on a probability conception. Such an approach is obviously to except a determinism absolutely while we consider a concrete single atom as a real object. Certainly, the quantum approach is a very nice tool if we study incoherent behavior a lots of atoms, namely the atomic systems prepared by accidental way. However many a time the results obtained in such experiments are erroneously ascribed to the concrete single atom behavior instead of to apply this to an effective average atom which is identically indiscernible one, as it is required by the quantum principle itself. This I believe is a principle reason to many misunderstandings.

Experiments with the single atom are rather hard and became accessible only recently. There is ,however, another more preferable way to get realistic information about a single atom behavior. I mean that we can study a behavior of a great number of atoms density of which is so small (dilute crystals, gases) that the atoms can practically no influence each other. Preparing such ensembles coherently and suppressing relaxation channels we can deduce conclusions about the single atom behavior from a coherent response of the noninteracting atoms in the ensemble.

A great deal of the experiments based on coherency of atomic oscillations are available at present (photon echo, transient light induced gratings, free induction decay and the other optical transients1).Using such phenomena one can trace a dynamic behavior of the atom while it is proceeding from one stationary state to another. Usually to adequately describe the optical transients the semiclassical approach is applied more successfully than the quantum electrodynamics. It turned out to make no sense in using the photon conception at all in order to fit the transient experimental data with the theory and real physical sense. Moreover the photon indivisibility principle as a main point of quantum electrodynamics appears to come to contradiction with the energy conservation law. In order to prove this assertion holds true let us consider a dynamics of energy behavior for a single atom in the well-known problem of a field-atom interaction. Let the atom be in the lowest energy state and subjected by a resonant step-like optical field with frequency and electric field strength


the unit field strength vector .

An isolated atom (in a dilute gas or a solid as an impurity) can be considered as a two-level system capable of being excited through an interaction of the electric dipole moment with an external optical field [1].The properties of a two level system are completely specified by the wave function


which is a linear superposition of the 1 and 2 stationary states ( - spin-down and spin-up eigenstates).The probability amplitudes are continuous functions on time, - eigenvalues of energy of the two level atom (stationary states).

When the atom subjected by the field (1) an evolution of its

wave function is governed by the nonstationary Schroedinger's equation


where , is the field-free Hamiltonian and - the interaction operator in electric dipole approximation due to the external field


where is the dipole moment operator of the transition and -

the electric field strength (1).

Following the substitution of (1), (2) and (4) into Eq.(3) we arrive to the well-known equations for the probability amplitudes [2]


where the detuning from resonance is at the transition frequency equaled to, the resonant Rabi frequency is , p - a projection of the dipole moment matrix element on the unit field strength vector .

We derive these equations in a usual fashion of a rotating

frame approximation under our initial conditions and ,

i.e. we consider the atom to be initially in the spin-down state until the applied field to be turned on.

The coefficients are completely specifying the properties of this atom at any moment on the time interval before the pump field (1) to be turned off at any instant . A time dependent behavior of these coefficients can be obtained from Eqs.5 as follows


Here the general (dnonresonant) Rabi frequency is

These functions can be used to find the average value of energy of the single atom after taking the mathematical expectation


followed by inserting the wave function (2) and Hamiltonian into it , making use of the stationary Schroedinger's equations


and orthonomality of the eigenstates .

As a result we obtain a time behavior of energy


where the interaction Hamiltonian is represented through nondiagonal matrix elements of the dipole moment operator and the applied field as follows


where one usually accept and .

Taking into account that and substituting the Ex.(6) into (9), we can obtain time behavior of energy of the single atom during transition from the stationary state to a higher one


where the parameter q(t) is a real time dependent periodic function


As to the high-frequency oscillations of the energy (the second and third terms in q(t) ) , they are rather small to be neglected at all because usually . Really, in experiments, the Rabi frequency is not more than 1010s-1 at the frequency of optical transition of about 1015s-1 . Therefore behavior of energy for the single atom during the spectroscopic transition is practically specified by the first term of to the q(t). As an example in F ig.1 , we show this behavior for two different situations: at exact resonance (frequency of the pump field is equal to ) and at detuning from resonance (at ) .

Fig.1. The dynamics of energy for the single atom during spectroscopic two-level transition between the stationary states E1 and E2 (two examples)

Ao - amplitude of step-like laser probe field, units ,

- average value of energy (increase in units at time in ):

1- exact resonance ( )

2- detuning from resonance () at

Three important conclusions can be deduced from the analysis of this Fig and the Exs.(11,12):

Thus, in the case of detuning from resonance , the energy portion which the atom takes away from the applied field at any instant of time is less of , i.e. the photon energy. Logical conclusions follow from this: in this process the atom is no obliged to absorb an energy in the form of photons and the field is no obliged to give the energy in the form of photons. Both of these conclusions make doubt to the main principle of the quantum electrodynamics, namely to indivisibility of a photon. Moreover, if one to guess that indivisibility of a photon holds true we can arrive to once more contradiction concerning to the energy conservation law.

Let us discuss that more in detail.

While the atom is proceeding from the spin-down state to the upper level its energy evolves deterministically, see Ex.(11). If the external field to be turned off at any time te the atom has to relax to the spin-down level, i.e. the atom should return the amount of energy that is less one photon energy.

This portion should be returned by means of electromagnetic radiation due to the induced dipole moment. Accordingly to quantum electrodynamics this field should consist of photons with energy each. Thus having got the amount of energy less one photon the atom has to return an amount more one photon at least. This obviously contradicts to the main principle of nature, namely to conservation energy law.

This same situation occurs at the exact resonance excitation (,).In this case the atom may reach to the upper level only at the concrete instants

, m=1,3,5...


Only for these moments we can guess the atom to has adsorbed one photon and the field has lost one photon as well. However to the other instants this conclusion does not hold true. For example, let us turn off the pumping field at the moment ,i.e. when the atom is in superposition state in which it has a concrete induced dipole moment oscillating with a frequency and energy less than .

Consequently, if to admit indivisibility of the photon a violation of energy conservation law could be available at exact resonant conditions as well.

Thus in order to the main principle of the nature does not is violated we must conclude that the coherent optical field is able to give his energy back in any amount by no means photons.

Such a conclusion could be reasonable at supposition that a monochromatic coherent wave is no consist of photons at all. In this case a great many misunderstandings can be removed by a natural way. As a matter of fact the monochromatic wave could be considered as a special phase state. Certainly, the optical field can be prepared by means of photons, as a water in a glass by drops. However both we can no assert the water in the glass consists of drops because there are no drops in the glass at all and we are not obliged to guess the monochromatic field consisting of photons. All depends on a preparation way of the field. For example, an incoherent field can be consistent of photons because they do not interfere each other. But the field prepared coherently, for instance by lasers, is in a new photonless phase state (water-like state) because in an active medium the induced radiation is co-ordinating reactions all of the dipoles in the volume.

  1. Allen L.,Eberly J.H. Optical resonance and two-level atoms, New York, Willey-Interscience Publication, 1975.
  2. Letokhov V.,Chebotaev V., Principles of nonlinear laser spectroscopy, Moscow, “Nauka”, 1975, in Russian.
to content

Знаете ли Вы, что такое мысленный эксперимент, gedanken experiment?
Это несуществующая практика, потусторонний опыт, воображение того, чего нет на самом деле. Мысленные эксперименты подобны снам наяву. Они рождают чудовищ. В отличие от физического эксперимента, который является опытной проверкой гипотез, "мысленный эксперимент" фокуснически подменяет экспериментальную проверку желаемыми, не проверенными на практике выводами, манипулируя логикообразными построениями, реально нарушающими саму логику путем использования недоказанных посылок в качестве доказанных, то есть путем подмены. Таким образом, основной задачей заявителей "мысленных экспериментов" является обман слушателя или читателя путем замены настоящего физического эксперимента его "куклой" - фиктивными рассуждениями под честное слово без самой физической проверки.
Заполнение физики воображаемыми, "мысленными экспериментами" привело к возникновению абсурдной сюрреалистической, спутанно-запутанной картины мира. Настоящий исследователь должен отличать такие "фантики" от настоящих ценностей.

Релятивисты и позитивисты утверждают, что "мысленный эксперимент" весьма полезный интрумент для проверки теорий (также возникающих в нашем уме) на непротиворечивость. В этом они обманывают людей, так как любая проверка может осуществляться только независимым от объекта проверки источником. Сам заявитель гипотезы не может быть проверкой своего же заявления, так как причина самого этого заявления есть отсутствие видимых для заявителя противоречий в заявлении.

Это мы видим на примере СТО и ОТО, превратившихся в своеобразный вид религии, управляющей наукой и общественным мнением. Никакое количество фактов, противоречащих им, не может преодолеть формулу Эйнштейна: "Если факт не соответствует теории - измените факт" (В другом варианте " - Факт не соответствует теории? - Тем хуже для факта").

Максимально, на что может претендовать "мысленный эксперимент" - это только на внутреннюю непротиворечивость гипотезы в рамках собственной, часто отнюдь не истинной логики заявителя. Соответсвие практике это не проверяет. Настоящая проверка может состояться только в действительном физическом эксперименте.

Эксперимент на то и эксперимент, что он есть не изощрение мысли, а проверка мысли. Непротиворечивая внутри себя мысль не может сама себя проверить. Это доказано Куртом Гёделем.

Понятие "мысленный эксперимент" придумано специально спекулянтами - релятивистами для шулерской подмены реальной проверки мысли на практике (эксперимента) своим "честным словом". Подробнее читайте в FAQ по эфирной физике.

Bourabai Research Institution home page

Боровское исследовательское учреждение - Bourabai Research Bourabai Research Institution